Forget about revenge.
In this game, it’s an easy thing to fall back on in that the Pumas have dumped us out of multiple World Cups but looking to wreak revenge on this Argentina side for the exploits of two years ago is pointless.
For a start, it gives them an elevated status that they probably don’t deserve based on their performances since that brutal day in October 2015.
Since they beat Ireland in 2015, Argentina have played 29 times, winning 9 times and losing 20 times. In that time they’ve beaten a disinterested French touring side, Uruguay, Chile, Italy (twice), Chile, Japan and Georgia.
On a more localised note, Argentina are just off a Rugby Championship campaign where they couldn’t find a W with both hands if it was tacked onto their jeans. Prior to that, they were washed comprehensively (and repeatedly) by an England B side over the summer.
If you look at the Rugby Championship since 2015/16, Argentina have only once. ONCE. That’s one win in three seasons.
So when I say that Ireland should be beating the Pumas on Saturday – and fairly comprehensibly at that – it’s based purely on what they’ve been producing on the pitch for the last few months and years.
First things first; let’s look at the team they selected.
Argentina XXIII vs Ireland
15. J. Tuculet; 14. R. Moyano; 13. M. Moroni; 12. IS. Gonzalez; 11. E. Boffelli; 10. N. Sanchez; 9. M. Landajo
1. S. Botta Garcia; 2. A. Creevy (captain); 3. N. Tetaz; 4. M. Alemanno; 5. T. Lavanini; 6. P. Matera; 7. M. Kremer; 8. T. Lezana.
Replacements: 16. J. Montoya; 17. L. Noguera; 18. E. Pieretto; 19. G. Petti; 20. JM. Leguizamon; 21. G. Bert; 22. J. De La Fuente; 23. S. Cancelliere.
It’s a pretty decent side, given that it’s the end of a large block of games for this Puma side.
How Will Argentina Look To Attack Ireland?
One thing that bothers me about this match up is how similar Argentina’s attack patterns are to the Scarlets – the same Scarlets that have repeatedly cut up Leinster and Munster over the past 12 months. If you’ve been reading TRK for the last 12 months, you’ll have seen my analysis on the Scarlets game plan – they smuggle large numbers into wide areas and get the ball there through a mix of forward handling up the middle and lightning quick ruck ball.
This is the pacey, high tempo game that the Pumas have utilized for the last few years and the template that saw them blow Ireland away in Cardiff in 2015. That day, Argentina chewed quick ball all day and hit Ireland in the wide channels relentlessly. We weren’t long cracking under the combined weight of their width and pace.
Their game has stayed pretty similar since then and I’ll say now what I said then – if Ireland had O’Connell, Trimble, O’Mahony, Payne, O’Brien and Sexton available we probably would have beaten this Pumas side, width and pace be damned. If. Fact is, we didn’t have those guys available and the game played out like it did. That game has been used as a stick to beat Joe Schmidt with since.
Argentina will look at our inexperienced 12-13-14 pairing and see an opportunity to repeat the trick of two years ago by flooding the wide channel with bodies and scrambling our defensive system.
They will target Farrell and Byrne repeatedly. They would have targeted that channel regardless but seeing two inexperienced guys there will encourage them.
They like to target this channel on set piece ball and loose phases; here’s an example of their scrum action.
The wide pass gets Sanchez onto the ball in the second layer, where he’s extraordinarily dangerous.
Creevy takes it up, pulls back to Sanchez who hits a nice flat ball across the line. This action is designed to draw men out of the line, stick defenders in place and get the ball into the tramlines where the Pumas are extremely dangerous in two on one situations. They blow this chance by carrying instead of popping the ball wide, but you can see the opportunity they crafted.
They did this off a ball just outside their own 22 and can be reliably expected to do it from anywhere. The reasons for this lead into what is probably Argentina’s biggest structural weakness at the moment.
Attack Sanchez
Argentina don’t like defending lineouts. It’s not that they’re bad in the air defensively – they’re fairly average at contesting – it’s that their biggest defensive weakness is exposed in this facet of the game. That weakness is the defensive work of Nicolas Sanchez and Argentina are painfully aware of this.
In attack, Sanchez is pacey, elusive and highly skilled. He’s an excellent and usually highly reliable goal kicker. In defence, however, he’s a liability that Argentina go to great lengths to hide.
Have a look at this action on set piece, and watch how quickly Sanchez cycles out of the middle of the pitch once he realises that he’s not the target.
Once he realises that the ball isn’t coming down the 10 channel he’s off to the wings with alarming directness.
Notes
- I’d rate Argentina as a decent scrummaging unit, a good lineout (with a caveat that their work to the tail is a bit iffy), and they currently have an average maul on both sides of the ball.
- I’d watch out for the likes of Kleber and Creevy over our ball because both of those lads are serious jackals. If we duplicate the rucking of last week, they’ll take us apart.
- We have to be very careful of Argentina smuggling men over on any one side when they’re in possession. We’ll know how dangerous those superloads can be.
- Argentina also tend to build in three forward pods (with the locks going first phase) after they make a big openside break so there’s a good opportunity to target them over the ball on those reverse pods.